![]() (2) No printer can print it, so not a whole lot of point in using it – especially since images have to be reduced to sRGB for lab printing and web use). (1) the screen can’t show that big a colour space – and what I can’t see, I can’t control. And I don’t want to have to change my entire colour management setup to ProPhoto achieve this. ![]() and I need all the PS edited files back in LR so I don’t have a nightmare with keeping track of location, batch renaming, metadata and exporting them in the 3 formats my client has requested. Problem: of course I need colour consistency between the two packages. Seriously, not just a bit different, but so different that even your granny would see it. Suddenly I notice the files – which look the same going from LR to PS – look COMPLETELY DIFFERENT when they come back from PS to LR. Two days ago I started editing a wedding crazy mixed light, mixed skintones, lots of PS needed to have people looking their best. So far so good, but I’ve been working on landscapes for months. I now do 90% of my imaging editing in LR, sending just a few files into PS (LR set to export in Adobe 98 & to automatically re-import PS files back to LR when saved). (Yeah, get me…smug isn’t the word)Įnter Lightroom 2. ![]() Having invested in a fancy-pants screen that displays 99% of Adobe98, and as part of a pretty anal colour management setup, this enables me to get such accurate screen-to-output colour matching on my Epson 3800 that I soft proof (PS CS3) and don’t need printed proofs any more. I use Adobe98 for my entire colour management workflow from camera to Photoshop. Interesting discussion folks, thank you all. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |